- PE license
- The state-issued license to practice engineering and seal work for the public. In Texas it is issued by TBPELS and typically requires an accredited engineering degree, passing the FE and PE exams, and four years of qualifying experience under a licensed engineer.
- EIT and the FE exam
- Engineer-in-Training is the interim credential earned by passing the NCEES Fundamentals of Engineering exam, usually near graduation. EITs do real production work but cannot seal it — they work under a licensed engineer while accruing the experience the PE requires.
- PE stamp and seal
- The physical or digital mark, with signature and date, that makes a drawing or report a legal engineering document. Sealing certifies the engineer personally exercised judgment over that work — sealing a set you did not supervise is grounds for discipline, not a formality.
- Engineer of record
- The named licensed engineer who takes legal responsibility for a discipline's design on a project — EOR, SEOR for structural, MEOR for mechanical. The EOR answers to the building official, responds during construction, and is the party a claim names.
- Responsible charge
- The direct control and personal supervision a licensed engineer must exercise over work bearing their seal. It is why a firm's capacity is bounded by its licensed staff rather than its headcount, and why plan-stamping arrangements are prohibited.
- Texas Engineering Practice Act
- Chapter 1001 of the Texas Occupations Code, administered by TBPELS. It restricts who may practice, use the title 'engineer,' or offer engineering services in Texas, and requires firms themselves to hold a registration number — which must appear on marketing material and sealed documents.
- QBS (qualifications-based selection)
- Selecting an engineer on competence and qualifications first, then negotiating a fair fee — required for federal work by the Brooks Act and mirrored in Texas statute for most public engineering procurement. Price cannot be the initial selection criterion.
- SOQ
- Statement of Qualifications — the response to an RFQ. Firm history and registration, key personnel resumes with licenses, directly relevant project experience, references, capacity and approach. Fee is generally excluded on purpose under QBS.
- RFQ vs RFP
- An RFQ asks who you are and what you have done and is scored without price; an RFP asks for a proposed approach and usually a fee. Public engineering work in Texas typically starts as an RFQ; private developer work is often a straight RFP or a direct negotiation.
- Prime vs sub
- The prime consultant holds the contract with the owner and carries schedule, coordination and liability for the whole design team; subconsultants contract to the prime. The same firm may be prime on a municipal project and a geotechnical sub on the next one.
- Teaming agreement
- A pre-selection agreement among firms pursuing a project together — who leads, how scope and fee split, exclusivity, and what happens if the team wins or loses. Signed before the SOQ so the pursuit can name the team credibly.
- DBE / HUB participation
- Disadvantaged Business Enterprise goals on federally funded work and Historically Underutilized Business goals on Texas state work. Prime firms must document good-faith effort and often build subconsultant teams specifically to meet the stated percentage.
- Professional liability insurance
- Errors-and-omissions coverage for claims arising from negligent professional services. Usually claims-made, so coverage must be maintained after the project closes; owners commonly specify per-claim and aggregate limits in the contract.
- Standard of care
- The legal measure of an engineer's duty — the ordinary skill and care of a competent engineer practicing in the same place at the same time. It is not perfection and not a guarantee, and contract language promising a 'best' or 'error-free' design can void insurance coverage.
- Indemnity and limitation of liability
- The clauses that allocate risk. Broad-form indemnity making the engineer responsible for others' negligence is often uninsurable; a limitation-of-liability clause caps exposure, commonly at the fee or a stated amount, and is one of the most negotiated terms in an engineering agreement.
- Hourly not-to-exceed
- Billing actual hours at agreed rates up to a ceiling. The owner pays only for time used but the engineer cannot exceed the cap without an approved amendment — common where scope is genuinely uncertain, such as investigation or construction-phase services.
- Lump sum and cost-plus
- Lump sum is a fixed fee for a defined scope, which puts efficiency risk on the engineer and makes tight scope definition essential. Cost-plus bills direct labor times a multiplier plus expenses, with or without a fixed fee, and is common on public and FAR-audited contracts.
- Raw labor rate and multiplier
- Raw rate is an employee's actual hourly pay. The multiplier — typically around 2.8 to 3.2 on cost-plus contracts — converts it into a billing rate by covering fringe benefits, overhead and profit. Owners audit both, and a firm's realized multiplier is a core profitability measure.
- Overhead rate and the FAR audit rate
- Indirect cost as a percentage of direct labor. Public agencies including TxDOT require an overhead rate computed under FAR Part 31 cost principles and audited by an independent CPA, and that audited rate is what the agency will pay — not the firm's internal number.
- Net service revenue
- Gross revenue less subconsultant and direct project expenses — the revenue actually earned by the firm's own labor. It is the denominator most engineering firm benchmarks use, because gross revenue can be inflated by pass-through subconsultants.
- Backlog
- Contracted work not yet performed, usually stated in months of net service revenue. It is the leading indicator of an engineering firm's health, drives hiring decisions, and is the first thing that moves when a market like land development turns.
- Utilization and realization
- Utilization is the share of an employee's hours charged to billable projects rather than overhead — production staff might target 85–95 percent while principals run far lower because they sell. Realization is the percentage of the value of those hours actually billed and collected, after write-offs for scope creep, rework or fixed-fee overruns. Together they are the primary levers on firm profitability: high utilization with poor realization means the team is busy losing money.
- Seller-doer
- The dominant business-development model in engineering: the licensed engineers who will actually run the project are the ones who sell it. It works because buyers are selecting a project manager, and it strains because billable production competes with pursuit time.
- Plan review
- The jurisdiction's technical review of submitted construction documents against code and local criteria, returned as comments the engineer must resolve and resubmit. Review cycles and their duration are usually the largest schedule risk on an entitlement project.
- Permit set
- The drawing and specification package prepared to obtain the building or site development permit. It is sealed and code-complete but may still lack the detail, coordination and vendor-specific information needed to build from.
- IFC (issued for construction)
- The sealed set released to the contractor to build from, incorporating permit comments and final coordination. Subsequent changes are handled by ASI, bulletin or change order rather than by quietly reissuing drawings.
- Submittals and RFIs
- During construction the contractor sends shop drawings, product data and samples for the engineer to review for general conformance with design intent — not to verify dimensions or means and methods. RFIs are written questions about the documents; both are billable construction-phase services and both create a liability record, so turnaround discipline matters.
- Record drawings
- The drawings updated at project close to reflect contractor-reported field changes. Engineers deliberately call them record drawings rather than 'as-builts,' because the engineer is transcribing the contractor's markups, not certifying that the field condition matches.
- Site civil
- The horizontal engineering that makes a site buildable — layout and dimensional control, grading, drainage, paving, water and wastewater service, fire lanes, erosion control and franchise-utility coordination. The discipline that most often controls a project's schedule to permit.
- Grading and drainage
- Designing finished elevations so the site drains, meets ADA slope limits, balances cut and fill, ties into adjacent property without adversely affecting it, and routes runoff to an approved outfall. Earthwork balance is often the single largest cost item the civil engineer controls.
- Detention and water quality
- Ponds, vaults and treatment structures sized so post-development peak discharge does not exceed pre-development rates and so runoff is treated before leaving the site. In Austin these controls are ordinance-driven, consume real developable land, and are set early in site planning.
- TCEQ Edwards Aquifer rules
- Development over the Edwards Aquifer Recharge and Contributing Zones in Central Texas requires a TCEQ-approved protection plan — a Water Pollution Abatement Plan or Contributing Zone Plan, with geologic assessment and sealed permanent BMPs. It adds review time and cost to a large share of Austin-area sites.
- Floodplain and FEMA CLOMR/LOMR
- Work in a mapped Special Flood Hazard Area requires hydraulic modeling and, when the design changes the mapped floodplain, a Conditional Letter of Map Revision before construction and a Letter of Map Revision after. CLOMR review runs many months and must be sequenced early.
- SWPPP and TPDES
- A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan documents the erosion and sediment controls, inspections and stabilization for a construction site disturbing an acre or more, filed under the TPDES construction general permit administered by TCEQ. Enforcement is real and falls on the operator.
- Traffic impact analysis
- A study of the trips a development will generate and how the surrounding network absorbs them, using ITE trip-generation rates and turning-movement counts. It commonly produces required mitigation — turn lanes, signals, driveway restrictions — that becomes a condition of approval.
- TxDOT permitting
- Any access, drainage or utility work in state right of way requires TxDOT review and permits — driveway access, drainage connections, utility installation, and often a review of the traffic study. Standards and timelines differ from city review and run on a separate track.
- Utility conflict
- An existing or planned utility that physically conflicts with proposed improvements. Identifying, subsurface-verifying and resolving conflicts — by relocation, adjustment or design change — is a distinct scope on roadway projects and a common source of construction delay and claims.
- Geotechnical boring
- A drilled subsurface exploration that recovers samples and in-situ measurements such as SPT blow counts, spaced and depth-controlled based on the structure. The boring log is the raw evidence behind every geotechnical recommendation, and inadequate exploration is a recurring claim source.
- Allowable bearing capacity
- The soil pressure a foundation may be designed for, incorporating a factor of safety against shear failure and a limit on tolerable settlement. The geotechnical report states it along with a recommended foundation system, and the structural engineer designs to it.
- Foundation design
- Selecting and sizing the system that transfers load to the ground — spread footings, mats, drilled piers, driven piles, or slab-on-grade. Central Texas expansive clays and shallow limestone drive the choice; post-tensioned slabs and drilled piers to rock are both routine here.
- Wind and seismic load
- Lateral design forces derived from ASCE 7 and adopted by the IBC, based on site location, risk category, exposure and site class. Most of Texas is wind- and not seismic-governed, but coastal wind speeds and the risk category assigned to schools and hospitals change the design substantially.
- Deferred submittal
- A portion of the design — pre-engineered metal buildings, cold-formed trusses, curtain wall, fire sprinklers, storage racking — that the building official permits to be submitted after the main permit, sealed by a specialty engineer and reviewed by the engineer of record for compatibility.
- Commissioning
- Systematically verifying that installed building systems perform as designed, from design review through functional performance testing and operator training. It is required by energy codes and LEED for many buildings, and the commissioning agent is intentionally independent of the design engineer.
- Energy code compliance and LEED
- Demonstrating a building meets the adopted energy code — IECC or ASHRAE 90.1 — by prescriptive path, performance path or energy modeling, usually via COMcheck or a whole-building model. LEED, WELL and similar rating systems sit on top of that baseline and are voluntary, not code.
- Load calculation
- The heating and cooling load analysis, typically ACCA Manual J or ASHRAE methods, that sizes HVAC equipment from envelope, orientation, occupancy, ventilation and internal gains. Oversizing wastes capital and hurts humidity control, which is why the calculation — not a rule of thumb — is the deliverable.
- ASHRAE 90.1
- The energy standard for buildings other than low-rise residential, referenced by the IECC as a compliance alternative and directly adopted by many jurisdictions. It sets envelope, HVAC, lighting power density, service water heating and control requirements, and is the baseline against which performance-path savings are measured.